"...The most obvious measure of gender inequality in male dominated
industries is numbers. The culture of professions such as the legal
profession is such that women are not attracted to them in great
numbers. As you know, the ***ual division of labour still finds an
overwhelming pro****tion of women in jobs which reflect the caring,
personal sup****t and ancillary roles that have been deemed appropriate
for women. Women paid in work generally including professional women
in authorative positions are assigned roles that are derivative of
caring, etc.
The next problem faced by women in male dominated profession is
promotion on "merit". the argument is often put that it takes, would
be a mistake to appoint women to the top positions on anything other
than merit beause the appointments would be seen as tokenism and would
do more harm to the advancement of women than good..." In this case,
what could you say about the evidence of gender inequity,
what could be "the select factors influencing basketball officating?"
have you ever been faced with? what are main determinants (the select
factors) influencing basketball officiating?
Have you ever been studying in theories of gender,
social/enviromental, contem****ary or feminist theories? what could
you say in this frame using the key words suc as "thougt process",
"rewarding/puni****ng", "conceptualized the social world",
"presentation of self", "streotypes", etc..?
|
