Re: Okay, who blabbed about Milestone Christian Academy?

On May 14, 4:49=A0pm, tho...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> NB <nobuy...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:

Classic lie from Tholen, given that the quoted text does not match
what I posted.


> >>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
> >>>>>>>> <bisectional2...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> NB <nobuy...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
> >>>>>>>>>>> Thomas Mertz wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> NB wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> It is unlikely that it was an imposter, Tholen, given that
t=
hey used
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> the same newsreader as you, the same ISP, and posted from
Ha=
waii.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Book him, Danno!
> >>>>>>>>>>> Tholen would be serving a life sentence if lying and
trolling =
were
> >>>>>>>>>>> crimes.
> >>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> >>>>>>>>> On your part, Tholen
> >>>>>>>> And whenever his lies are do***ented and exposed, he simply
paper=
s over
> >>>>>>>> them with yet more lies, or tries to absolve himself by
claiming =
other
> >>>>>>>> people do as he does, or claims other people have mental
defects.=
 Or
> >>>>>>>> all of the above.
> >>>>>>> More classic substantiated and correct claims from the honest
Deco=
,
> >>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
> >>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim from Tholen.
> >>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim from nobuyout.
> >>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim from Tholen.
> >> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim from nobuyout.
> > Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim from Tholen.
>
> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim from nobuyout.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim from Tholen.
>
> >>>>>> =A0 =A0"Everything I type is a lie."
> >>>>>> =A0 =A0 =A0 --Art Deco =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0
> >>>>> If Deco said, "Everything I type is a lie", then that statement
itse=
lf
> >>>>> must be a lie, which means that not everything that Deco types is
a
> >>>>> lie.
> >>>> So, using your reasoning, nobuyout, is his statement a lie or not?
> >>> If you had better reading comprehension skills, Tholen, you would
> >>> already know the answer to that question.
> >> I see that you didn't answer the question, nobuyout.
> >> No surprise there, really.
> > Because the answer already exists in the quoted text, Tholen,
>
> I see that you still didn't answer the question, nobuyout.

Answering the question would be superfluous, Tholen, given that the
answer has already been provided.

> No surprise there, really.

I'm not surprised by your lack of reading comprehension skills,
Tholen.

>
> > which you would know if you had better reading comprehension skills.
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim from Tholen.

>
> >>>>>>> who is standing up to demented/deranged/lying trolls like
Tholen.
> >>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. =A0
> >>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim from Tholen.
> >>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim from nobuyout.
> >>> Thank you for acknowledging that you made an unsubstantiated and
> >>> erroneous claim, Tholen.
> >> Classic erroneous presupposition.
> > Classic lie from the liar Tholen, who edited the quoted text.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim from Tholen.

>
> > That is
> > more proof that Tholen is a troll, given that only a troll would do
> > that.
>
> Speaking from first-hand experience, nobuyout? =A0You did, after all,
> start an irrelevant thread about some alleged ban from Google Groups
> in a classical music newsgroup, which is proof that you are a troll.

Classic illogic from Tholen, given that I stated that editing the
quoted text was proof that Tholen is a troll, which has nothing to do
with talking about a Google ban.

>
> > I have changed it back to what he had originally written.
>
> Editing quoted text, eh nobuyout? =A0More proof that you are a troll:

Classic erroneous presupposition, given that I was only correcting
your lie.

>
> =A0 =A0"given that only a troll would do that."
> =A0 =A0 =A0 --nobuyout

"Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim from Tholen."
  --tholen

>
> >>>>>> Rather ironic as well.
> >>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim from Tholen.
> >>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim from nobuyout.
> >>> Thank you for acknowledging that you made an unsubstantiated and
> >>> erroneous claim, Tholen.
> >> Classic erroneous presupposition.
> > Classic lie from the liar Tholen, who edited the quoted text.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim from Tholen.

>
> > That is
> > more proof that Tholen is a troll, given that only a troll would do
> > that.
>
> Speaking from first-hand experience, nobuyout? =A0You did, after all,
> start an irrelevant thread about some alleged ban from Google Groups
> in a classical music newsgroup, which is proof that you are a troll.

Classic illogic from Tholen, given that I stated that editing the
quoted text was proof that Tholen is a troll, which has nothing to do
with talking about a Google ban.

>
> > I have changed it back to what he had originally written.
>
> Editing quoted text, eh nobuyout? =A0More proof that you are a troll:

Classic erroneous presupposition, given that I was only correcting
your lie.

>
> =A0 =A0"given that only a troll would do that."
> =A0 =A0 =A0 --nobuyout

"Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim from Tholen."
  --tholen