Re: VOTE! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008

On May 6, 6:10=A0pm, tho...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> NB <nobuy...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
> >>>>> Art Deco <e...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>>>>> :nelohT
> >>>>>>> Art Deco <e...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
> >>>>>>>> Forwarded to newsgroups experiencing Tholenization.
> >>>>>>> Still using an inappropriate description for your cross-posting
to=

> >>>>>>> irrelevant newsgroups, eh Deco? =3DA0You really should call it
"De=
coization".
> >>>>>>>> Note that nelohT/Tholen is on the ballot in *five* places,
includ=
ing
> >>>>>>>> Coward of the Month, and that he is up against some very
quality =
kooks
> >>>>>>>> in several races.
> >>>>>>> Who is "nelohT/Tholen", Deco? =3DA0There is nobody in this
newsgro=
up using
> >>>>>>> that alias. =A0Rather ironic that you should talk about "Coward
of=
 the
> >>>>>>> Month", considering your ongoing use of a fake name.
> >>>>> I'm willing to bet Tholen's life savings (which can't be much,
> >>>>> considering he is an astronomy professor, LOL) that his birth
> >>>>> certificate does not say "tho...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" on it.
> >>>> What does your bet have to do with college basketball, nobuyout?
> >>> Classic tacit acknowledgement from tholen that his birth certificate
> >>> says "David James Tholen" on it.
> >> Classic erroneous presupposition.
> > Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim from Tholen.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim from nobuyout.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim from Tholen.
>
> >>>>>>>> Your vote counts!
> >>>>>>> According to whom, Deco? =3DA0And what does any of that have to
do=
 with
> >>>>>>> college basketball?
> >>>>>> Great campaign speech, Tholen! Thanks!
> >>>>> Deco, would the voters vote for someone who has acknowledged that
he=

> >>>>> has syphilis?
> >>>> What does your classic erroneous presupposition have to do with
> >>>> college basketball, nobuyout?
> >>> Did I erroneously presuppose that you are someone, i.e. a person,
> >>> tholen?
> >> I see that you didn't answer the question, nobuyout.
> > Suffering from logic comprehension problems, tholen?
>
> Obviously not, nobuyout.

So then why are you posting illogical responses, Tholen?

>
> > It is logical
> > that I didn't answer your question, given that your question was
> > classically vague.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

On your part, Tholen, given that there was more than one thing that
could have been the alleged erroneous presupposition that you
mentioned.

>
> >> No surprise there, really.
> > It is correct that it is no surprise that you did not answer my
> > request for clarification, tholen.
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition.

Another ambiguous and erroneous statement from Tholen.