Art Deco <erfc@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
> :nelohT
Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>>> :nelohT
>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
Note: no response.
>>>>> :nelohT
>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>> Note: no response.
Note: still no response.
>>>>>> <m.ap@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Peter T. Daniels wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Would it be the same one that forces you to keep coming back
to this
>>>>>>>>>>> thread after it's been dormant for days, and to its topic
after it's
>>>>>>>>>>> been dead for weeks?
>>>>>>>>>> It's a pretty amazing coincidence!
>>>>>>>>> Eighteen days this time. And he still adds crossposts to the
dogfood
>>>>>>>>> religion.
>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition, Daniels.
>>>>>>> Why did you say 'classic'?
>>>>>> What does your question have to do with college basketball, m.ap?
>>>>> Why do you remove "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" from attributions, Tholen?
>>>> What does your classic erroneous presupposition of a question have to
>>>> do with college basketball, Deco?
>>> Another question Tholen will never answer.
>> How can I answer the question for you, Deco? You want me to guess
>> what your question has to do with college basketball, Deco?
> Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Tholen?
Classic erroneous presupposition.
> Here, another op****tunity for you to run away:
Classic erroneous presupposition.
> Why do you remove "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" from attributions, Tholen?
What does your classic erroneous presupposition of a question have to
do with college basketball, Deco?
|
