On Mar 22, 4:34=A0pm, "Terraholm" <TerraholmSPAM...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> MACK DADDY wrote:
> > On Mar 21, 10:23 pm, Blazer Fan Dan <BlazerFan...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> On Mar 21, 10:01 pm, MACK DADDY <pepsivani...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > Those aren't s****ts fans! =A0Their opinion isn't relevant to this
> > conversation. =A0****tland doesn't have baseball or football, true fans
> > of those s****ts will sup****t Mariners and Seahawks unless they are
> > just some bandwagon riding traitors who think it's cool to sup****t the
> > Yankees and the Patriots.
>
> lol...when there is no team in your state (or even if there is) =A0you
are=
> certainly not required to take the closest one.
> In my area most are California Bay Area team fans because those were the
> ones we got on TV for many years.
> I am a casual fan of the seashawks but sleep though baseball games.
>
> I love that in 24 hours a member of a team has to switch loyalty (it is
ev=
en
> in the contract) =A0while a fan is evil for rooting for another team.
>
> --
> Laurel T
> Frank Layden on a 60-foot Maurice Lucas shot that
> sent a game into overtime:
> "In most places he would have won a car
> =A0or a trip to Hawaii. =A0All he got was a tie."
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Don't get me wrong, I never said people can't root for far away
teams. I just don't understand favoring them over the home, or
closest team. Yes, I'm aware before Seattle got the Mariners the Bay
Area teams were the closest teams, and were shown on tv here. I
suspect before the Blazers and Sonics came on the scene it must have
been similar, I don't remember.
|
