Re: Sonics to OKC? Seriously?

On May 1, 6:15=A0pm, "Don't Taze Me, Bro!" <No2Exis...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> I can see some reasons why. I mean, its a smaller big city. The owner
has
> ties to Oklahoma. He can capture the entire attention of a city that
does
> not have a pro s****ts team...
>
> However, if I were an owner. I would take my chances in St. Louis. I
think=

> St. Louis can handle a basketball team.
>
> The population of the St. Louis regional area, is roughly 3 million.
>
> The population of the Oklahoma City Regional area, is roughly 1.2
million.=

>
> St Louis has an urban community that would constantly provide for the
> team... I can only see Oklahoman's keeping their eye on OSU and OU
s****ts.=

>
> If he moves the team to OKC... I predict it to be a failure with-in 5
year=
s.
>
> --
> ____
>
> --Boycotting the 2008 China Olympic Games--

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I'm always hearing what a great businessman Gay Bennett is.  Moving
the Sonics to Oklahoma doesn't rank as good business sense.  St.
Louis, or even Kansas City would be better.  Best yet would be leaving
the team in Seattle where they have been for 41 years eh!