imaginehappin...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
youre the same guy who told us that
> > we lost a game because Harris ONLY had 26 min 6 turn overs, and no
points.
>
>
I said when Harris had 33 mins or more,they won the game 9 times out of
ten in the playoffs.Could they have won the game if he had less?Yes.You
guys were piling on him saying to take him out and that he wasn't a
difference maker at all.
But as I pointed out, when they lost he usually had less than 33.Less
than 33 didn't mean an automatic loss,but when they did lose,he had
less than 33 mins,where as when he had 33 or more,they won.I was just
going by statistics by way of boxscore.What a person weens from that is
up to them but clearly the facts don't lie as he is a difference
maker.Whether it was a byproduct or whatever,you brought your own
suppositions to it,saying less than 33 was a loss, I was just stating
the fact which is irrefutable.YOu brought your own meaning to it.
|
