Re: the atl can make history, be very afraid smeltic fan...

"JK" <no@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:ct3v14h622jvg1bjil4pmuk5i34s3hqgud@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On 5 May 2008 18:23:04 GMT, theBZA <dewey3kNOSPAM@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>JK <no@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>>news:rhdu14pmi19beoid0m415engtrd0h7r58k@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>> On 5 May 2008 14:38:42 GMT, theBZA <dewey3kNOSPAM@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>>>JK <no@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>>>>news:up8t14ltqp09bsvvknp6c3b8u4htqee0t3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>
>>>>> On 4 May 2008 21:33:33 GMT, theBZA <dewey3kNOSPAM@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>sounds like the smeltics in the playoffs, except that they arent
>>>>>>>>that young...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We beat them by an average of 25.25 points in Boston and they won
>>>>>>> by an average of 5.6 in Atlanta.  No comparison.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>And yet, the series went 7. By your logic, a 4-0 sweep where each
>>>>>>game was won by 1 point would have been worse.
>>>>>
>>>>> The point being that the guy who said the Celtics looked just like
>>>>> the Hawks is a moron.
>>>>
>>>>So you made an even more moronic point to prove that?
>>>
>>> We blew the Hawks out every time we beat them.  They barely squeaked
>>> by every time they won.
>>>
>>> You're a 5th degree dumbass.
>>>
>>Like I said. You can win 3 games by 25 points each and lose 4 by 1 each
>>and you still lose the series. You point is meaningless and moronic.
>
> You're the idiot who thinks losing by 35+ and losing by 3 is the same
> thing.

Both losses. Seems pretty clear to me. Or did you mean...

;-)