Re: the atl can make history, be very afraid smeltic fan...

"Dano" <janeanddano@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
news:F4ednRCydZpczILVnZ2dnUVZ_saknZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

> Magic-MARK-er wrote:
>> JK <no@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>> news:rhdu14pmi19beoid0m415engtrd0h7r58k@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>> On 5 May 2008 14:38:42 GMT, theBZA
>>> <dewey3kNOSPAM@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>>> JK <no@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>>>> news:up8t14ltqp09bsvvknp6c3b8u4htqee0t3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>
>>>>> On 4 May 2008 21:33:33 GMT, theBZA
>>>>> <dewey3kNOSPAM@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> sounds like the smeltics in the playoffs, except that
>>>>>>>> they arent that young...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We beat them by an average of 25.25 points in Boston
>>>>>>> and they won by an average of 5.6 in Atlanta.  No
>>>>>>> comparison.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> And yet, the series went 7. By your logic, a 4-0 sweep
>>>>>> where each game was won by 1 point would have been worse.
>>>>>
>>>>> The point being that the guy who said the Celtics looked
>>>>> just like the Hawks is a moron.
>>>>
>>>> So you made an even more moronic point to prove that?
>>>
>>> We blew the Hawks out every time we beat them.  They barely
>>> squeaked by every time they won.
>>>
>>> You're a 5th degree dumbass.
>>
>> Just remember smartass....
>> No team that took 7 games to win a first round playoff series
>> had EVER made it to the finals.
> 
> What an utterly meaningless stat that one is.  Did you stay up all
> night researching that one?  Get a life. 
> 
Meaningless? Are you on crack? You may not like it, but that doesn't 
make it irrelevant. Now frankly, I doubt it's true - but if it is, it is 
quote meaningful.


-- 
If I were a cactus, I wouldn't need so much water.