Re: Which of the following is responsible for that nonsense?

JK wrote:
> On Sat, 03 May 2008 03:10:18 GMT, "Skeptic" <bcs002b@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> Should have had Rondo that last play.  Never should have put him back
in 
>> after he sat him in the 4th - he clearly was not playing well.
> 
> They put him back in because Cassell can't play defense.  Rondo was in
> to play defense on the prior possession.  With no timeouts, a sub
> could not be made.

What about while the Hawks were shooting free throws?  Unless there is 
an arcane rule that prevents it, no reason not to get House in the game 
then.

Ray

-- 
All generalizations are wrong.