Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Basketball > Boston Celtics > Re: Despondent
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 20 of 33 Topic 4266 of 5147
Post > Topic >>

Re: Despondent

by JK <no@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 3, 2008 at 12:45 AM

On Sat, 03 May 2008 03:23:26 GMT, "Skeptic" <bcs002b@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>Wow, that's a really whiny post.  The C's are going to the line less
because 
>they're less aggressive.  Some calls were bad and others questionable. 
It 
>by no means comes even close to accounting for the huge difference.

Have you been watching the games?  Pierce gets called for an offensive
foul for hooking (and rightfully so) yet Joe Johnson does it nearly
every time he touches the ball and the officials don't even bat an
eye?  A foul is called every time they drive the lane, but rarely do
they blow the whistle when we get banged around doing the same thing?
Since when did it become taboo to call out BAD officiating?  I'm
certainly not afraid to call a spade a spade.  If that gets
misconstrued as whining, so be it.  The officiating isn't the sole
reason why this is a 3-3 series, but anyone who thinks it's not a
major contributing factor isn't paying attention.
 




 33 Posts in Topic:
Despondent
Rick Umali <rgu@[EMAIL  2008-05-02 21:59:57 
Re: Despondent
"Skeptic" <b  2008-05-03 03:07:34 
Re: Despondent
JK <no@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-03 00:37:53 
Re: Despondent
"Skeptic" <b  2008-05-11 03:11:30 
Re: Despondent
JK <no@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-10 22:44:59 
Re: Despondent
"Skeptic" <b  2008-05-11 13:05:43 
Re: Despondent
JK <no@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-11 12:16:54 
Re: Despondent
"Skeptic" <b  2008-05-11 19:39:36 
Re: Despondent
JK <no@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-11 20:15:21 
Re: Despondent
"Skeptic" <b  2008-05-20 12:43:35 
Re: Despondent
JK <no@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-20 13:38:49 
Re: Despondent
"Skeptic" <b  2008-05-21 00:11:04 
Re: Despondent
JK <no@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-20 22:32:02 
Re: Despondent
"Skeptic" <b  2008-05-21 12:01:09 
Re: Despondent
JK <no@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-21 12:24:32 
Re: Despondent
mbouc66297 <mbouc66297  2008-05-02 20:20:49 
Re: Despondent
"Skeptic" <b  2008-05-03 03:23:26 
Re: Despondent
"Jack Dotson" &  2008-05-02 23:57:14 
Re: Despondent
"Skeptic" <b  2008-05-11 03:09:42 
Re: Despondent
JK <no@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-03 00:45:45 
Re: Despondent
"Skeptic" <b  2008-05-11 03:14:31 
Re: Despondent
JK <no@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-10 22:46:52 
Re: Despondent
"Skeptic" <b  2008-05-11 13:06:45 
Re: Despondent
JK <no@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-11 12:21:26 
Re: Despondent
"Skeptic" <b  2008-05-11 19:40:05 
Re: Despondent
JK <no@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-11 20:13:42 
Re: Despondent
mbouc66297 <mbouc66297  2008-05-02 20:26:44 
Re: Despondent
"Tom" <thild  2008-05-03 04:17:23 
Re: Despondent
Miguel MB <PUN@[EMAIL   2008-05-02 23:42:52 
Re: Despondent
KYLERSGRANDPA@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-03 08:15:06 
Re: Despondent
JK <no@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-03 00:39:59 
Re: Despondent
Miguel MB <PUN@[EMAIL   2008-05-02 23:41:46 
Re: Despondent
JK <no@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-03 00:33:50 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Aug 28 14:30:50 CDT 2008.